Channel linking self-healing #211

Closed
opened 2026-01-08 03:37:25 -05:00 by sirdog3355 · 1 comment
sirdog3355 commented 2026-01-08 03:37:25 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Per Fleff in #210:

Whenever the bot starts up it'd be a neat feature to have it quick check who's in one channel and who has access to the private channels.
Basically a safety check for if enduragrok was ever down that it'll fix the text channel permissions for people when it returns.
Not required, especially cause we have few outages afaik.

Moving this into a separate issue for proper scoping purposes. This can be worked on after a minimum viable release version of the channel linking exists.

Per Fleff in #210: > Whenever the bot starts up it'd be a neat feature to have it quick check who's in one channel and who has access to the private channels. Basically a safety check for if enduragrok was ever down that it'll fix the text channel permissions for people when it returns. Not required, especially cause we have few outages afaik. Moving this into a separate issue for proper scoping purposes. This can be worked on _after_ a minimum viable release version of the channel linking exists.
sirdog3355 commented 2026-02-12 17:07:03 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Channel linking has been in production for a little over 2 weeks and has run into minimal issues. There are not that many channels in production that are linked. Cleaning them manually should not be difficult.

This may or may not be possible based on what is available by the Discord API, and I haven't felt motivated since v2.11 to check.

Given this is self-proclaimed to not be required, going to close as not planned. Can be re-visited if the community does not disband due to the the damn age verification rollout and it becomes more necessary or desirable.

Channel linking has been in production for a little over 2 weeks and has run into minimal issues. There are not that many channels in production that are linked. Cleaning them manually should not be difficult. This may or may not be possible based on what is available by the Discord API, and I haven't felt motivated since v2.11 to check. Given this is self-proclaimed to not be required, going to close as not planned. Can be re-visited if the community does not disband due to the the damn age verification rollout and it becomes more necessary or desirable.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.